Tuesday, October 30, 2007

How Not To Get Dizzy When Anorexic

1921: the origins of the "woman question"

it we will not be difficult recognize that women, as and when they worked in production and become economically independent, reacted with a growing bitterness about their second-class existence - both in family and in society.

Any observer free and free of bias can easily see that there is a contradiction between the recognition of women as a force for socially useful work and discrimination legislation bourgeois. This contradiction between the meaning of work of women for production, on the one hand, and lack of rights of a political perspective and social, on the other hand, as its subordination to her husband who has long since ceased, however, support her, this contradiction, so we owe it to the original birth of the so-called "woman question."
The "woman question" was posed with particular vehemence in the second half of last century, although we find already the beginnings in this direction at a much earlier period. We already see the time when competition from the factory rushed to bankrupt the small craftsmen and home workers, forcing them to sell their own strength Working with large enterprises as well as that of their wives and children.

At the end of the eighteenth century and early nineteenth century, the "woman question" But mainly focused on women's wages and their right to "decent work".
In three centuries, the guilds and their privileges with the severity of their decrees made so that the woman found herself excluded from the crafts.
corporations tried to relegate her kitchen forever, that is to say that women should withdraw from the production and give it to humans. What resulted was naturally aggravate the situation of women. Since she lost the opportunity to exercise a craft, it became easier prey to the manufacturer and the victim of its operating policy.
In France, the system then dominated the manufacturing production. But the factories were rarely large enough to be called industrial enterprises, that is to say more than a hundred workers. Working at home and manufacturing flourished and patrolled the whole of France. Small manufacturing enterprises with no more than ten to twenty workers multiplied like mushrooms in the Paris region and in other French cities. In these factories, we not only sewed fabrics and linens heavy and coarse to the finest lace, but also articles of gold or metal, and all sorts of everyday objects. Many women worked in the weaving and spinning. They were often even 90% of the total labor force employed in this sector. In France, the manufacture of silk was almost moved to industrial production. In this area, the factory had won on home industry and manufacturing.

the eve of the French Revolution, the female proletariat had developed considerably, and the suburbs of Paris were flooded with beggars and prostitutes, a multitude of unemployed women, suffering from poverty and hunger. It is therefore not surprising that during the riots of July 1789, the women are engaged in a particularly vehement against domination and exploitation of the rich.
"Women of the people" of Paris claimed consistently in their slogans and their petitions the right to work and the promise of "earn an honest living." They also demanded the right to work for man and woman, along with a ban for man to work in typically female occupations, alongside a commitment to give up looking for work in areas specifically male. "If we seek work, not to liberate us men, but for us to build an independent existence in a modest ," said one of these petitions.
When the French Revolution, women in the Third Estate demanded free access to all the crafts or in other words, the "unlimited freedom of labor." These claims were designed to enable tens of thousands of women suffering from poverty and hunger to escape poverty and prostitution. This was not only women's claims, but it claims to own the entire interest of French industrial proletariat.
residents of the suburbs of Paris protesting and shouting together: "Freedom work! "Freedom of the work meant to clear the final elimination of feudalism and consolidating the dominance of the bourgeoisie and the liquidation of privileges for corporations. Indicated their interest in French class the best way to go if they wanted one day a chance to win "honest living".

Women of the French proletariat stood clearly on the side of the Revolution.

Kollontai - Lecturer at the University Sverdlov on women's liberation

Tuesday, October 23, 2007

Av To Usb Adapter Radio Shack

Around 310 BC: Death is nothing to us

Get used second to think that death is nothing for us as well and evil exist only in sensation. Hence it follows that a precise knowledge of the fact that death is nothing to allow us to enjoy this mortal life, avoiding us to add a sense of eternal life and taking away the regret of immortality.
because there was nothing formidable in life who understood that there is nothing terrible in fact no longer live.
Whoever said not to fear death because once it came formidable, but because it is dangerous to wait for him is a fool.
is folly to grieve because death is expected, since this is something which, once come, do not hurt.
Thus, the most terrible of all evils, death, is nothing for us, as long as we live, there is no death. And when death is there, then we're not.
Death is neither for the living or the dead, since for some it is not, and that others are not. But the crowd, sometimes fears death as the worst of evils, now desires as the term of the ills of life.
The wise man does not fear death, life is not a burden to him, and he does not believe that this is an evil no longer exist. As this is not the abundance of food, but the quality we like, so, this is not the length of life, but his charm that pleases us.
As for those who counsel the young man to live well, and the old man to die, they are naive, not only because life has charm, even for the old man, but because the desire to live well and sake of dying well are one. Although most naive
is still claiming that he does not born is a good and that life is evil. For example, one that says: " And when one is born, the earliest cross the gates of Hades ."
For if we say this with conviction, why not suicide? This solution always easy to take, if it desires so badly. And if you said this in jest, it is shown on a frivolous issue that is not.
must therefore remember that the future is neither ours, nor quite foreign to us, so we should not expect as if it were to happen, nor despair as if they were in any way occur.

EPICURE - Letter to Menoeceus
(letter preserved by Diogenes Laertius), translation R. Genaille (1933)

Saturday, October 13, 2007

Does Hair Grow Back After Anorexia

1882: to live is to die

Life and Death. Now, do not pass for scientific physiology, which conceives death as an essential moment of life, which includes the negation of life as essentially contained in life itself, so it is always thought in relation to its necessary result, she is constantly in a state of germ his death.
The dialectical conception of life is nothing.
But for anyone who has understood this, it is finished all the talk about the immortality of the soul.
Or death is decomposition of the body, leaving nothing behind him that the component elements chemically meaningless, or it leaves a principle of life, more or less identical to the soul, which survives all living organisms, not only to humans.
So just to clarify here simply by using the dialectical nature of life and death to eliminate an ancient superstitions.
live is to die.

Friedrich Engels - Dialectics of Nature

Sunday, October 7, 2007

Is Normal To Masterbate With The Shower Head

1782: Dialogue Between a Priest and a Dying

Celebrant: arrived at this fatal moment, when the veil of illusion that does not tear the man to leave the table cruel seduces his errors and his vices, do you not repent , my child, disorders multiplied where you took away the weakness and human frailty? The moribund
: Yes, my friend, I repent.
Celebrant: Well, enjoy these happy remorse for the sky, in the short interval that you have left, general absolution for your sins, and remember that it is only through the mediation of the holy Sacrament penance that it will be possible to obtain eternal. The moribund
: I can not hear more than you understand me.
Celebrant: What! The moribund
: I told you I was sorry.
Celebrant: I heard. The moribund
: Yes, but without understanding.
Celebrant: What interpretation? ... The moribund
: The here ... Created by nature with very sharp taste, with very strong passions; only placed in this world for me to deliver and to meet them, and these effects of my creation being only on the necessities first views of nature or, if you love best, only dérivaisons essential to his plans for me, all because of its laws, I am sorry that n have not quite found his omnipotence, and my only remorse relate only to the mediocre use I made of the faculties (criminal you think simple to me) she had given me to serve, I sometimes resisted him, I repent. Blinded by the absurdity of your systems, I fought with them all the violence of desire, I had received an inspiration more divine, and I repent, I have reaped only flowers when I could make a large crop of fruit ... Those are just reasons of my regrets, believe me not me not enough to assume others.
Celebrant: Where you lead your mistakes, where you lead your sophistries! You lend the thing created all the power of the creator, and these unfortunate tendencies you have lost - you do not see that they are only the effects of this corrupt nature, to which you attribute omnipotence. The moribund
: Ami - it seems to me that your dialectic is as false as your mind. I want you more just reasonable, or that you do not let me die in peace. What do you mean by Creator, and what do you mean by corrupted nature?
Celebrant: The creator is the master of the universe, he has done everything created, and which retains a simple fact of his omnipotence. The moribund
: This is a great man indeed. Well, tell me why this man is so powerful you think has yet made a nature so corrupt.
Celebrant: What merit had been men, God would not let them do their free will, and what merit they would have to enjoy it if there ever was on earth the opportunity to do good and the need to avoid evil? The moribund
: So your god wanted to do everything wrong to tempt or test his creature, he does not know, he does not doubt the outcome?
Celebrant: He probably knew, but suddenly he wanted to give him credit for the choice. The moribund
: What good, when he knew it would take the party and it was up to him, since you say all-powerful, that it was up to him, I say, make him take the good.
Celebrant: Who can understand the immense and endless views of God and man can understand everything we see? The moribund
: Whoever makes things simple, my friend, especially one that does not multiply causes, to better confuse their effects. What did you need a second difficulty, when you can not explain the first, and once it is possible that nature alone has done what you attribute to your god, why would you pick him a master? The cause of what you do not understand, is perhaps the thing in the world easier. Improves your physical and you will understand better the nature, purifies your reason, banish your prejudices and you will not need your god.
Marquis de Sade - Dialogue between a Priest and a Dying
(to read the full text, click here )