Is Showerguard Worth It

Roselyne Bachelot

Here is the text of a letter I just sent to Roselyne Bachelot.

Madam Minister ,

I am writing to express my disagreement and my concern over the remarks you made in response Last Wednesday, a topical issue raised by Mr. Jean-François Lamour about the failure of the France team in world football in South Africa.

You have indeed described the national team as a team "where bullies to control immature kids scared." You are not without measure, I am sure, the scope and connotation of these words, which probably would not have been used for other sports.

As Minister of Youth and Sports , I believe it is essential that you avoid, under media pressure to yield to such language facilities. They regulate nothing, and may contribute to brand a bit more people in the suburbs, which are nothing to do with the failure Sports Federation French Football.

I pray you, Madam Minister , receive my respectful greetings.

Julien Dray

How To Do A Combination On Calculator

Letter to "reform" of Pensions: an unfair and ineffective tinkering

The government has been slow to admit it, has employed all the tricks to mitigate this information, but now all the cards are slaughtered: The main measure of its bailout of pensions is the decline of the statutory retirement age from 60 to 62 years, coupled with the decline from 65 to 67 years of age required to automatically receive a full pension, regardless of the number of years we have contributed. We are told that it is both a fair and inevitable. What is it really?

The justice of this plan, it is still looking for, except to think it's fair to pay for the other French people who began work early, who are less skilled and more modest. Currently, the French can retire at age 60 while receiving a full pension because they have started to work and thus to contribute sooner than others. Those who were fortunate enough to study long and work later, are already obliged to contribute for longer and thus to work beyond age 60, to receive a full pension. These will not be affected by the measure. Only the former will suffer the consequences. Is this justice? If indeed this is sufficient only to save system, it means very clearly that the government chose to charge the workers and employees' pensions executives.

But even if he, for this to be meaningful, the French 60 years can actually work two more years. It is, in the current job market, completely illusory. In our country, the elderly, such as youth, are among the first victims of unemployment. When 7 Swedes aged 60 to 10 work, only 3 French in the same age are in this situation! We do not see why employers would suddenly employ more workers in this age category, and even older. What happens, then, between 60 and 62 years? Very simply, our fellow citizens who should have become younger retirees will become, in fact, older unemployed. And so far "fix" the problem of pensions, we simply transfer their deficit to Unedic or disability to credit, given the possible ill health at this age. Nice round of monte if any. The cost to society will be twofold: increase the number of people receiving unemployment benefits, disability, of early retirees; it still decrease the number of jobs for young people who find themselves in competition on the labor market with these new job seekers 60, 61, 62.

this must be added the effects, less often criticized, the postponement of the retirement age for full pension from 65 to 67 years. Currently, whatever your career, you can receive a full pension at 65. With the government's plan, it took two more years. The French have a career "Holey , Which have experienced periods of prolonged unemployment - a situation more and more common - will be directly penalized.

It is therefore absurd to justify this reform by its justness. But what is even more questionable is the argument-club that he would "necessarily" push back the age of retirement, "since the lifetime increases." Yes, life is increasing - but not necessarily life in good health, and especially not for all. At 35, an executive can expect to live 6 years older than a worker, but 10 years older in good health. Yet the government claims that it takes into account in its reform, the hardship, since a sick or disabled employee may leave earlier retirement. But this is actually quite the opposite of a serious consideration of the hardship which would be to decide in advance that the toughest jobs and making use most are eligible for a retirement earlier. With this measure, in fact, it was once sick - in other words, once the damage - that an employee may assert his rights

It's not all. There is a certain intellectual dishonesty to mechanically link in the absolute increase in life span and increase working time. Longer life does not begin yesterday when a French from 1810 could expect to live 37 years, 43 years in 1900, and 80 years ago today, the time duration of working time has not increased proportionately. Quite the contrary, during the twentieth century, even as life expectancy doubled, that the great social achievements in the reduction of weekly working time and throughout life, took place. If evidence is that the link is not mechanical, but political, and is in fact based on the draft of society we have.

Ultimately, the right is playing a final argument, that of comparison with other countries. Precisely compare. In Germany, normally a symbol of discipline and fiscal responsibility, we can go to the full pension at age 63, having only paid 35 years! The France will be the only country to reject both the legal age to retire, the age of full retirement, and the contribution period. We will inherit the system the hardest in Europe.

display This reform, which is not fair - it focuses the efforts for 2 / 3 through work, for 1 / 3 of the capital - or effective - it does nothing beyond 2020 - in fact one goal: make a short term fix public accounts in the short term, to show their credentials to the financial markets, which, with the disastrous episode in Greek, proved that they intend to dictate their Peoples Act. We had promised to "restore the system": one does, ultimately, that handle a few settings to save the better off, and save face.

So what? The Socialist Party has a universal pension system and personalized to ensure the legal starting at age 60, taking into account all forms of hardship, encouraging individual choice to work longer, but as part of collective agreements. New resources will come from leveraging of capital income, a moderate increase and spread over time of employer and employee contributions, and improved employment of older workers (firms employing older workers will receive bonuses on their contributions, others with penalties). It should also build on the Pensions Reserve Fund, created by the left and the right wants to siphon off to hide deficits. The purpose of this fund is to perpetuate, by the interests of its investments, the funding of our pension system. It should itself be funded by income from privatization of public enterprises, but the right, even though it has many privatized since 2002, has never done. We propose to change policy, and to refinance the fund by a tax surcharge on banks. I personally think that we could also use to do this, the real estate of the state, currently poorly managed and left, worse than idle, in a state of constant deterioration. Poorly known, it could represent up to 60 million square meters, and tens of billions of euros. As the nation's heritage, it would be legitimate to draw upon to defend the future of our pensions.

Julien Dray

Firex Smoke Alarm How To Remove

Bad trial of Maurice Szafran

Maurice Szafran violently taking me to task about what I have denounced in the media treatment of the case of the Blues - that attempt, more or less free to impose a way of interpreting ethnic, nationalist, and sometimes even racist athletic failure of the selection year 2010 - I want to return to this controversy, and reading that in fact the journalist Marianne.

I have been careful in my speeches written and audiovisual works, to make the distinction between the failure of sports both its other interpretations. Of these interpretations, we find several kinds: those that explain the failure by some sort of sporting failure civilization (the defeat of the blues would win the money-king, individualism, etc.). Those growing link to this explanation, more or less explicitly, this failure civilizational ethnic origin and / or social Bleus. The lack of collective sense of the team is linked to communal divisions, the shelving of a particular player would be based on anti-white racism, etc. .

Those moving in this direction, as Alain Finkielkraut, simply take over and finally tackle racist stereotypes, anti-poor, anti-suburban, situations - most importantly - they have had of second-hand information. I have not seen, in fact, that all the distinguished commentators on the national indignity of Blues Domenech had the opportunity to share the intimacy of their dressing room. Approximate recovery and interpretation - and ideological - of rumors: the makings of a lynching irrational are in place. Recipe that works well, to see how exasperation to the legitimate sporting fiasco, we went to a national outburst somewhat disproportionate.

Maurice Szafran missed it all, or is, more likely, pretending not to see it. That's right. More surprising is his reasoning, which is in fact based on one argument: Maurice Szafran is the voice of the people. Who disagrees with him is "unable" to "take into account the real, unable to hear" these millions of citizens outraged by "the young retarded" and unable to hear as "Disgust" that "rises from the streets, pubs, villages" (sic).

Not having the ear as fine as Maurice Szafran, I will not have the audacity to claim intimate knowledge of the secret thoughts and private conversations, "millions" of French and Marianne readers. What I know however, that's life for my constituents, residents and residents of my constituency popular Essonne. Among them those of Grigny youngest city in France, crossing town of considerable economic and social difficulties, city, certainly far removed from living quarters where this reporter found. I see how young "immigrant" still struggling to find work, study longer, or just get by. I see how these galleys are too often linked to the rejection of part of French society that does not seek to understand, and takes away with arguments or value judgments that we know well

What we do not make me say what I did not say. This is not because we came from suburban poor that one is necessarily vulgar, or that one has the right not to honor a teacher or an adult. But why not see the injustice that is wrong with youth sports, from scratch, very good living, when you let the rich with impunity perpetrators and beneficiaries of the financial crisis, or when is satisfied with a glass ceiling which makes the paths to success in middle and upper classes are closed to youth popular strata of society?

I do not pretend to define the "left suitable "or" morals. " But what I know to be neither moral nor decent, it is this society of "two weights, two measures", which depending on whether you come or not good neighborhoods, depending on whether or not you have the wrong skin color we showed great indulgence, or otherwise complete intolerance towards you.

And I bear even less is the media ratonnade a so-called Republican Left, which never ceases to speak of a "republic" which in fact n exists only for some and not others. Yes, I think the mixed republic. I never thought it was idyllic: it is instead an ongoing struggle for acceptance of its rights and duties. I was the first elected left to denounce and fight both communalism and the rise in violence is because I am intransigent on these issues I can not let them make false accusations, and interpretations that unduly stigmatize and globalize.

Things are said. I'd rather be with these people I speak to defend my republic, that side of sermonizers who do not know that from the smaller end of their lens of choice.

Julien Dray

Sidekick How To Hack Sim

A soccer who lost the ball

Football passion is a fact, and it is normally one of his qualities. But the passion we have moved in recent days, a sort of collective hysteria, grew louder by the hour, and where the sport is relegated to the background, becoming the pretext for all kinds of malicious instrumentalisations .

The facts are simple: the disappointing performance Team France, which is also not yet eliminated, it must be noted at the time of writing. Disclaimer (cons) each performance will have its reading or analysis, and I will not dwell here on my own, which is worth less or more than the coach who sleeps in each of the 60 million French.

But besides sporting considerations, legitimate and logical, it is clear that what the controversy swelled, pushing up in the shadow of the subjects of any importance (the issue of pensions, at random ) is a Apart from reading schemes we are trying to impose, and other journalistic practices are implemented.

Grid reading: it is increasingly clear as people start to speak, it was decided to make this team with the trial of France mixed with a selection of 1998 had been considered the standard . I said I disagree with what Mr. Finkielkraut said on the subject, I think as often, he said aloud and without oratorical precautions that part of France thinks quietly. Critics more or less candid about the behavior of French players, their language, their "home" or their religious affiliation, are often the translation of intolerance against the suburbs and their inhabitants. So far, we still tolerate the success of French - often "from diversity," as we say modestly - in sport, failing to open their way to other careers and successes, but this episode shows that the glass ceiling is still down one floor, and that even in high performance sport these citizens become infréquentables. Just look at how we analyze authority interpersonal conflicts as cultural clashes between "Black", "Arabs", "Muslims" and white "well behaved" without even listening to what other players say these tensions when they do not belie not purely and simply. It's very simple: those who defend a fantasy vision of a "war of civilizations" internal to our country want to make our disappointments sports his example and demonstration. Attitude blaster completely irresponsible.

then journalistic practices. The controversy took a more violent turn with revelations on the internal life of the Blues' locker room, engaged in the pasture with the view of the remarks certainly unacceptable, but that the group would probably tricolor "managed" in it if he had let the occasion. We now familiar ritual of the reasons the press on this type of process, the use of information leaks and "confidential" we swear hand on heart that everything is done in the name transparency and the duty to inform; it would be irresponsible from taking back home with crucial information to understand an event. Unfortunately, in all situations of this type, More prosaically, there is a tendency of the press in voyeurism, a trend that will crescendo as newspapers face increasing difficulties to keep or win readers. The tabloids know, to sell, you have coverage and headlines that are not in lace. Too bad the sports daily benchmark has fallen into this trap. Beyond this new incident, it is the general question of ethics and scope of work of the press as a whole that is, once again, asked.

This afternoon, the Blues 2010 version will have a final opportunity to come out on top of that imbroglio sized psychodrama. There would be no better answer to give to those who use their failures for purposes that have little to do with sport and its values.

Julien Dray

French Movies Streaming Salieri

Press Julien Dray about the involvement of the President of the Republic in the resumption of World

denials by spokesmen of the UMP on the involvement of the President of the Republic in the selection of offers to buy the world should not disguise the real issues of this episode. The problem is not that Mr Sarkozy looks to the future of the French press, or he met their leaders and this poses real problem is the content of his remarks. The term "rumor" as used about them by Messrs. Lefebvre and Paille is quite inappropriate, since it is not noise reported at dinner parties, but a report made by Eric Fottorino his appointment at the Elysee Palace before the chiefs of service daily.

Mr. Fottorino publicly reported and assumed that these remarks, no one imagines lie knowingly and shamelessly. Must therefore well conclude that there was an attempt to pressure to intentionally disrupt one of the offers and distort the whole process of recovery.

Genital Brazilian Wax Movie

For spring primaries That is all

The primary project of the socialist party raises many hopes. Even if the information reached me these last months of the commission's development aroused in me a few reservations, I decided to remain silent, not wanting to disturb the near unanimity in the PS on this point. But what we learned this week - that neither MRC nor the GWP are unlikely to participate in their organization, not to mention other parties further away from us - has convinced me to speak, especially since the reasons given by these formations confront my own remarks. We were promised the primary across the left, massive and popular and we are heading towards the nomination of one candidate by socialist activists and supporters. If this configuration is confirmed, it may be insufficient to meet the challenges of 2012.

It would be wrong to believe that winning the next presidential election is mechanically acquired the left and So the PS. The right candidate will very likely the incumbent president - for 30 years, each occupant of the Elysee have done a second term. This candidate will be based on considerable economic pressure on the media support that we have already seen at work, and the state apparatus. He has kept the confidence of his camp if he continues to defend the tax shield, and he probably will seek to embody the movement and dynamics, while locking us in the role of defenders of archaic social gains.

The left hand does not as a favorite. She has one trump card - if it manages to mobilize - the people. A left victory in 2012 will be popular or will not. Popular mobilization will be allowed, ultimately, the match between the socialist project and the aspirations of the middle and popular, but it will depend, initially, by the ability of PS to associate these French, and all the left parties, selection and construction of the best candidate to beat the right. That's what the system must allow the primaries, as I have defended for over 10 years.

The primary will be successful if they fascinate the public, and the French are participating actors deeply involved in this process, and then wishing to carry and defend the candidate they have helped to select .

To succeed in this mobilization, the time factor is crucial. Primaries too short will not allow time for the French to be interested and take it. They give them all the less inclined they will not leave enough space Emerging applications in order to raise awareness and build: a limited period of debate will qu'inscrire in stone the initial state of public opinion. Primaries are primaries brief confirmation of what the polls say so. Does this mean a guarantee of victory? Far from it; recent experience proves it. The polls go, the French are. Even those who have ratified a nomination "obvious" may be the first to get tired, if it does not closely linked and associated. The primaries are only useful as an instrument of transformation of opinion. If they only become instant translation, they have been for nothing.

Duration is not the only fundamental fact: the date is also essential. Late primaries will not leave enough time for their winner to unify the party and left behind him, and part of the political landscape as the leading opponent of Nicolas Sarkozy. Again, the experience of 2006, like that of Francois Mitterrand, speaks for itself. If the candidate is nominated by the summer of 2011, it will all time to develop his campaign parallel to the current president. He or she may even lead left to battle for the Senate in September, and from the presidential backed this victory possible. Conversely, a designation fall, put away the post-senatorial, see the PS and its partners once again, is painstakingly put in running order as President of the Republic plow the country already.

The primary project currently being discussed within the Socialist Party advocates, contrary to this analysis, a process short and late. He discouraged to our loyal allies of the MRC and the PRG, which had yet directly joined our candidate in 2006. They may include: short and late primaries, the primaries of "confirmation", uncompetitive, destined to play a scenario written in advance, can be a serious attraction for them. They summarize, in fact, a designation of the socialist candidate amplified tens of thousands of supporters - even those, probably, who had joined us in 2006 before moving away from us. To mobilize very largely middle and working classes to enable them to appropriate a candidate that is truly theirs, and they support a whole year, we need primary spring 2011, and primary open long enough to serve the French and our partners, that the game worth the candle.

Julien DRAY

Wild Thornberrys Wildlife Rescue Game -big -fish

Since AFP saw fit, in the way of a dispatch on my way to the Europe 1 morning, giving his own reading of my About the Interior Minister, I want to re-emphasize my position here.

First, the sentence Hortefeux is unacceptable for a Minister of the Republic. It must be condemned as such, and it was.

Secondly, should we conclude that it is a racist and he should therefore resign? To these two questions this morning I said no, and I persist. To say this is by no means the " defend" or justify, excuse his comments. It just put things in their place and deny that the terms that are used are overused, and that nothing has meaning.

It is unfortunate that in the current situation, those responsible for interventions and transcribe the information first think to make buzz and to raise mayonnaise, according to a mechanism that is knows well: a telegram and each repeat, without review or verify the sources, which he read at his neighbor. All this not to be left out and miss a scoop.

A news agency on the issue this morning which would have entitled not Dray (PS) defends Hortefeux, "a Republican" who not racist, but Julien Dray condemns About Hortefeux, but does not request his resignation would have been more faithful. But: it would not have to play the tune of dividing the left, or my compromise with Nicolas Sarkozy. Angle probably sells more ... Media to know where their priorities.

Julien Dray